In a recent issue of Niche Report I wrote an article on how
to safely “walk away” from your mortgage. That article discussed consumer
protection statutes enacted by such states as California known to lawyers
and real estate professionals alike as “anti
– deficiency” legislation. This legislation protects homeowners who could no
longer afford to debt service their mortgage from personal liability on their
mortgage and allows them to simply “walk away” from an over encumbered or
“underwater” property.
That article sparked a
number of inquiries from our readers many of whom wondered what the impact of
the Internal Revenue rules on cancellation of debt had on those homeowners who elected
to “walk away” from their mortgage, lost their home through foreclosure or
benefited from a short – sale or modification that included a principal
reduction. This article attempts to shed some light on that subject.
Generally, if a debt for which you are personally liable is
canceled or forgiven, other than as a gift or bequest, you must include the
canceled amount in your income.
In the context of today’s real estate market, this means that
when your property is foreclosed upon or repossessed and sold, you are treated
for purposes of income tax as having sold the property at the fair market value.
Whether you ultimately have a recognizable gain for tax purposes depends
upon whether you are personally liable for the debt and whether the outstanding
loan balance is greater than the fair market value of the property.
When a foreclosure takes place, whether by a strategic “walk
away” default or otherwise, it is common for the underlying debt securing the
home to be far greater than the current fair market value of the property being
foreclosed upon. Why else would someone “walk away” and allow their property to
be foreclosed, but for the fact that there is no equity?
Should you lose your home by foreclosure, cancellation of debt
occurs. However, foreclosure is not the
only situation in which cancellation of debt occurs. Homeowners who were able
to secure a short sale, deed in lieu or for
those lucky enough to have negotiated a principal reduction modification are all
subject to the Internal Revenue rules on cancellation of debt.
Given that foreclosure, short sales and
modifications are pervasive in this economy the subject of cancellation of debt
is something that all homeowners must consider when deciding on how to deal
with their over encumbered property.
While the general rule is that tax payers who
receive the benefit of a cancellation of indebtedness are subject to taxation
for a recognizable taxable gain, fortunately there are several
exclusions and exceptions which may result in part or all of the forgiven debt
not being nontaxable.
The first and most often used exclusion is the “Bankruptcy” exclusion.
Under this exclusion a debt cancelled as a result of filing for bankruptcy
under Title 11 of the United States code would be excluded and non - taxable.
The second most common exclusion is the “Insolvency” exclusion.
This provision of the IRS code provides that if the total of all your
liabilities was greater than the fair market value of your assets at the time
the debt was cancelled, there is no recognizable gain from the cancellation for
tax purposes.
By far, however, the most important exclusion can be found in
the Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007. Enacted by Congress as a direct result of
the crash in Wall Street, our economy and the real estate market this
legislation was specifically designed to protect those homeowners who are
burdened by a mortgage they can no longer afford and a principal residence they
are unable to sell.
This Mortgage Debt Relief Act of 2007 generally
allows taxpayers to exclude income from the discharge of debt on their
principal residence. Debt reduced through mortgage restructuring, as well as
mortgage debt forgiven in connection with a foreclosure, qualifies for this
relief.
The provisions of this Congressional enactment
apply to debt forgiven in calendar years 2007 through 2012. Up to $2 million of
forgiven debt is eligible for this exclusion ($1 million if married filing
separately). To qualify, the debt must have been used to buy, build or
substantially improve your principal residence and be secured by that
residence.
Refinanced debt proceeds used for the purpose
of substantially improving your principal residence also qualify for the
exclusion.
One must be careful, however, proceeds of refinanced debt used for other purposes – for
example, to pay off credit card debt – do not qualify for the exclusion. In addition, debt forgiven on second homes or
rental property does not qualify for this tax relief provision. In some cases,
however, other tax relief provisions – such as insolvency or bankruptcy – may
be applicable.
More information on this subject including
detailed examples can be gotten from your tax professional or found in IRS
Publication 4681, Canceled Debts,
Foreclosures, Repossessions, and Abandonments. Also see IRS news release IR-2008-17.
No comments:
Post a Comment